LAUDERDALE v. HOBBS, 5:13-cv-00040-KGB. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150220908
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this case on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). SO ADJUDGED. JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this case on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). SO ADJUDGED. JUDGMENT In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this ..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this case on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
SO ADJUDGED.
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Court's Order entered in this case on this date, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief requested is denied. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because petitioner Kitaka Lauderdale has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
SO ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
