U.S. v. Hiramanek, 17-cv-03389 N.C. 17-cv-03392 NC (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170621g78
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 10 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed respondent Adil Hiramanek's June 20 filing, docket number 10 in case number 17-cv-03389. In it, he states that he is "contemplating an appropriate filing that may require" recusal of the undersigned magistrate judge in these related cases. No facts that would require recusal are presented. If Mr. Hiramanek has a factual basis for the Court to consider whether recusal is appropriate, he must
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 10 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed respondent Adil Hiramanek's June 20 filing, docket number 10 in case number 17-cv-03389. In it, he states that he is "contemplating an appropriate filing that may require" recusal of the undersigned magistrate judge in these related cases. No facts that would require recusal are presented. If Mr. Hiramanek has a factual basis for the Court to consider whether recusal is appropriate, he must ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 10
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has reviewed respondent Adil Hiramanek's June 20 filing, docket number 10 in case number 17-cv-03389. In it, he states that he is "contemplating an appropriate filing that may require" recusal of the undersigned magistrate judge in these related cases. No facts that would require recusal are presented. If Mr. Hiramanek has a factual basis for the Court to consider whether recusal is appropriate, he must present them in a declaration under penalty of perjury filed by July 5, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
