Filed: Mar. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER , Senior District Judge . On February 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 73). No objections were filed. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district c
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER , Senior District Judge . On February 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 73). No objections were filed. A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district co..
More
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.
On February 11, 2015, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 73). No objections were filed.
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district court's review of the part objected to must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 73) is ADOPTED and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
