Carson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 8:17-cv-02232-JVS-KES. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190822a19
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 115), and in light of Plaintiff Stanford Buckles, Theresa Tailford, and Jeffery C. Ruderman's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted by that Order, the Court hereby enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action as follows: 1. The Court enters judgment for Defendant Experian Informat
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 115), and in light of Plaintiff Stanford Buckles, Theresa Tailford, and Jeffery C. Ruderman's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted by that Order, the Court hereby enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action as follows: 1. The Court enters judgment for Defendant Experian Informati..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the Court's Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 115), and in light of Plaintiff Stanford Buckles, Theresa Tailford, and Jeffery C. Ruderman's (collectively, "Plaintiffs") failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted by that Order, the Court hereby enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action as follows:
1. The Court enters judgment for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") and against Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs' complaint in this action and dismisses this action without prejudice;
2. Plaintiffs recover nothing from Experian;
3. Experian may recover costs and attorney fees from Plaintiffs to the extent permitted by law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
