Peterson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC, 1:17-cv-01005-LJO-SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180215941
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Doc. 17) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to dismiss the matter with prejudice as to the named plaintiff, Erika Peterson ("Plaintiff"), and without prejudice as to the Putative Class alleged in the complaint, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (Doc. 17.) Accordingly, this action has been dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class, pursua
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Doc. 17) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to dismiss the matter with prejudice as to the named plaintiff, Erika Peterson ("Plaintiff"), and without prejudice as to the Putative Class alleged in the complaint, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (Doc. 17.) Accordingly, this action has been dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class, pursuan..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
(Doc. 17)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to dismiss the matter with prejudice as to the named plaintiff, Erika Peterson ("Plaintiff"), and without prejudice as to the Putative Class alleged in the complaint, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. (Doc. 17.)
Accordingly, this action has been dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the parties will bear their own respective costs and expenses. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
