Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gregg v. U.S. Bank National Association, C 18-04211 WHA. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181002g63 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO VACATE PREVIOUS ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On July 18, 2018, defendant U.S. Bank National Association filed a motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Katrina Gregg's complaint (Dkt. No. 8). Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff had fourteen days from the date defendant filed its motion to file her opposition. Plaintiff failed to meet the August 1 deadline. On August 10, defendant renoticed its motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 14). On August 17, this Co
More

ORDER TO VACATE PREVIOUS ORDER

On July 18, 2018, defendant U.S. Bank National Association filed a motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Katrina Gregg's complaint (Dkt. No. 8). Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff had fourteen days from the date defendant filed its motion to file her opposition. Plaintiff failed to meet the August 1 deadline.

On August 10, defendant renoticed its motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 14). On August 17, this Court filed an order to show cause, giving plaintiff until August 27 to file a response to defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 17). Plaintiff failed to file a response. On September 5, this Court filed a second order to show cause giving plaintiff until September 20 to a file a response to defendant's motion (Dkt. No. 19). Having still not heard from plaintiff, this Court granted defendants' motion and vacated the September 27 hearing (Dkt. No. 23).

The Court has received plaintiff's letter requesting an order returning plaintiff's hearing to the calendar because the Court's previous orders to show cause were sent to an old address (Dkt. No. 26). Plaintiff also filed a response to defendants' motion to strike and provided her new address (Dkt. No. 25). Accordingly, the order dismissing without prejudice is VACATED and the above-entitled matter is hereby reopened.

The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is reset for OCTOBER 25, 2018 at 8:00 A.M. Plaintiff has until OCTOBER 12, 2018 at NOON to file an opposition to defendant's motion to strike. Defendant's reply is due OCTOBER 19, 2018 at NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer