Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A.P. v. Community Care Licensing, 2:13-cv-01588 JAM-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140619812 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING TIME FOR JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs Robin Mammen, et. al., Defendants Community Care Licensing and Michelle Wong in her official capacity (collectively "State Defendants"), and County of Sacramento, Stephanie Lynch, Michelle Callejas, Debra Williams, Renae Rodocker, Luis Villa and Craig Larkin (collectively "Coun
More

JOINT STIPULATION SETTING TIME FOR FILING OF PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING TIME FOR JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs Robin Mammen, et. al., Defendants Community Care Licensing and Michelle Wong in her official capacity (collectively "State Defendants"), and County of Sacramento, Stephanie Lynch, Michelle Callejas, Debra Williams, Renae Rodocker, Luis Villa and Craig Larkin (collectively "County Defendants") by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to a date for the filing of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint and to postpone the submission of their Joint Case Management Conference Statement as set forth below:

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2014 the Court granted the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint of Defendants Community Care Licensing and Michelle Wong in her official capacity (collectively "State Defendants") with leave to amend certain portions of the complaint;

WHEREAS, no specific date was set forth in the Court's order for the filing of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a deadline of 21 days from the issuance of the Court's June 9, 2014 Order for Plaintiffs to file their Third Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, this extension is sought so that the parties may enhance efficiency and meet and confer as to the submission of the Joint Case Management Conference Statement pending the resolution of motions directed at the Third Amended Complaint or the filing of an Answer;

WHEREAS, in the interest of justice and in an effort to enhance judicial efficiency and preserve resources, the parties agree to postpone the submission of the Joint Case Management Statement until thirty (30) days after any motion directed at the Third Amended Complaint is ruled upon, or if no motion is filed, within thirty (30) days of the filing of an Answer by the State Defendants;

WHEREAS, the extension sought will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order.

NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before June 30, 2014 and that submission of the Joint Case Management Statement shall be postponed until thirty (30) days after the Court rules on a motion directed at the Third Amended Complaint, or if no motion is filed, thirty (30) days after the State Defendants file an Answer to the Third Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDRED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer