U.S. v. DAVIS, 2:13-CR-00086 GEB. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160425609
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Jolene Davis through her counsel Kresta Daly, that: 1. By previous minute order this case was set for status conference on April 22, 2016; 2. Defendants now move to continue this matter to June 17, 2016 pursuant to a T4 exclusion. The prosecution does not object to this
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Jolene Davis through her counsel Kresta Daly, that: 1. By previous minute order this case was set for status conference on April 22, 2016; 2. Defendants now move to continue this matter to June 17, 2016 pursuant to a T4 exclusion. The prosecution does not object to this ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Matthew Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Jolene Davis through her counsel Kresta Daly, that:
1. By previous minute order this case was set for status conference on April 22, 2016;
2. Defendants now move to continue this matter to June 17, 2016 pursuant to a T4 exclusion. The prosecution does not object to this request.
3. The parties stipulate and request the Court make the following findings:
a. The reason for the continuance as to all defendants is to allow the parties and their lawyers to investigate, review discovery and examine possible defenses.
b. Progress on the defense investigation is being made but all counsel require additional time to effectively prepare.
c. Counsel for the defendants believe that failure to grant them the above requested additional time would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account due diligence.
d. The parties are actively engaged in plea negotiations.
e. The government does not object to a continuance.
f. Based on the above stated findings the ends of justice served by continuing the case outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a Speedy Trial.
g. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of April 22, 2016 to June 17, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at Ms. Davis' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial.
h. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: April 20, 2016. By /s/Kresta Nora Daly for
MATTHEW MORRIS,
Assistant United States Attorney
ORDER
The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, up to and including June 17, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) T4 (reasonable time for counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the April 22, 2016 status conference shall be continued until June 17, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
Source: Leagle
