Harris v. Brown, 1:15-cv-00816-LJO-SAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190730990
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 23) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejud
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 23) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudi..
More
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 23)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On July 26, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 23.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorney's fees.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
