Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint, Inc., 13-CV-05808-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160328679 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to agree upon a modified schedule for pre-trial deadlines. In conjunction with this modified schedule, the Parties respectfully r
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to agree upon a modified schedule for pre-trial deadlines. In conjunction with this modified schedule, the Parties respectfully request the Court move the Pretrial Conference from May 10, 2016 to May 24, 2016 and extend the pretrial deadlines set forth below. The Parties stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Pretrial Conference is currently scheduled for May 10, 2016;

WHEREAS the hearing for motions on summary judgment is currently scheduled for March 31, 2016;

WHEREAS, the parties have made substantial effort to work together in good faith to stipulate to extending existing pre-trial deadlines without altering the existing trial date in order to potentially narrow the issues in dispute and streamline their Daubert, motions in limine, and pre-trial submissions to the Court;

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following pre-trial deadlines:

Original Stipulated Event Deadline Proposed New Deadline April 5, 2016 April 15, 2016 Opening Daubert Motions due April 19, 2016 April 28, 2016 Motions in limine due April 19, 2016 May 3, 2016 Oppositions to Daubert Motions April 26, 2016 May 5, 2016 Oppositions to motions in limine due April 26, 2016 May 10, 2016 Reply Daubert Motions and Joint pretrial statement and proposed order, proposed jury instructions, proposed voir dire questions, witness list, proposed verdict forms, proposed statement of the case, and trial briefs due April 27, 2016 May 11, 2016 by Courtesy copy of binders of pretrial filings due noon May 10, 2016 May 24, 2016 Pretrial Conference and Daubert, motions in limine, hearing

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request (1) the Pretrial Conference be rescheduled for May 24, 2016; (2) pretrial submissions deadlines be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

/s/ Peter Klivans Peter Klivans

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

(1) The Pretrial Conference shall be on May 24, 2016;

(2) The Parties shall carry out pretrial submissions as set forth in the March 24, 2016 Stipulation Regarding Pretrial Conference and Pretrial Deadlines.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer