Drone USA, Inc. v. Ferro, CV 17-5124-DMG (SKx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190104689
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [76] DOLLY M. GEE , District Judge . The Court having considered the Stipulation re (1) Dismissal of Action and (2) Retention of Court's Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Doc. # 76], and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. For a period of 14 months following the entry of this Order, the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the November 27, 2018 Settlement Agreement ente
Summary: ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [76] DOLLY M. GEE , District Judge . The Court having considered the Stipulation re (1) Dismissal of Action and (2) Retention of Court's Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Doc. # 76], and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. For a period of 14 months following the entry of this Order, the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the November 27, 2018 Settlement Agreement enter..
More
ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION AND RETAIN JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [76]
DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.
The Court having considered the Stipulation re (1) Dismissal of Action and (2) Retention of Court's Jurisdiction to Enforce Settlement Agreement [Doc. # 76], and good cause appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. For a period of 14 months following the entry of this Order, the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the November 27, 2018 Settlement Agreement entered into by and between Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Drone USA, Inc. and Counterdefendant Michael Bannon and Defendant and Counterclaimant Paulo Ferro.
2. Subject to the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement pursuant to this Order, the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
