Berglund v. Colvin, 2:15-CV-02332-CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160811a99
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of August 24, 2016, by fourteen days, to the new due date of S
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of August 24, 2016, by fourteen days, to the new due date of Se..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of August 24, 2016, by fourteen days, to the new due date of September 7, 2016, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly. This extension is requested due to several time-consuming medical appointments during this next couple of weeks.
ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file her Reply on or before September 7, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
