Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARDNER v. COLEMAN, 2:12-cv-1981 GEB CKD PS. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140916a23 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to comply with the court's order directing plaintiff to respond to discovery. Because plaintiff had been paroled and his address had changed, the order directing plaintiff to respond to discovery was not timely served on plaintiff. The order was re-served on plaintiff on August 19, 2014. Plaintiff will be granted an extension of time to respond to the discovery. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that no fur
More

ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to comply with the court's order directing plaintiff to respond to discovery. Because plaintiff had been paroled and his address had changed, the order directing plaintiff to respond to discovery was not timely served on plaintiff. The order was re-served on plaintiff on August 19, 2014. Plaintiff will be granted an extension of time to respond to the discovery. Plaintiff is cautioned, however, that no further extensions will be granted. If plaintiff does not have available to him the documents associated with the instant litigation due to his recent re-incarceration, plaintiff should respond to the discovery to the best of his ability to recall the responsive information.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 29, 2014, plaintiff shall comply with the court's July 7, 2014 order granting defendant's motion to compel.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer