Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BRASHER v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC., 1:16-cv-01185. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171101b26 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN M. McNAMEE , Senior District Judge . On October 18, 2017, Defendant Amerigas Propane, Inc. ("Defendant") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 23.) Ordinarily, the setting of oral argument on the motion would dictate the deadlines for the response and reply. ( See LRCiv 230.) In this case, however, given the visiting status of Judge McNamee, the Court will depart from the Eastern District of California's Local Rules and set a deadline for the response and reply sua spon
More

ORDER

On October 18, 2017, Defendant Amerigas Propane, Inc. ("Defendant") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 23.) Ordinarily, the setting of oral argument on the motion would dictate the deadlines for the response and reply. (See LRCiv 230.) In this case, however, given the visiting status of Judge McNamee, the Court will depart from the Eastern District of California's Local Rules and set a deadline for the response and reply sua sponte. If the Court deems oral argument necessary, it will schedule it at a later time. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) by Monday, November 27, 2017.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by Monday, December 11, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer