Coston v. Rahimifar, 1:17-cv-00765-LJO-JDP. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181224700
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ECF Nos. 16, 24 LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Daniel Murphy Coston is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 23, 2018, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendation
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ECF Nos. 16, 24 LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Daniel Murphy Coston is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 23, 2018, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
ECF Nos. 16, 24
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Murphy Coston is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 23, 2018, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations that the Court deny defendant Mushtaq Ahmed's motion to dismiss. ECF No. 24. The parties had an opportunity to object to the findings and recommendations. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on October 23, 2018, ECF No. 24, are adopted in full;
2. Defendant Mushtaq Ahmed's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 16, is denied; and
3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
