Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JONES v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, C14-00733 NC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140723989 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12, 16-2(e)] NATHANIEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff TRAVIS JONES, by and through his attorney of record, Kenneth Frucht of Geonetta & Frucht LLP, Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and JAMES BOSWELL, by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel's Office (the "C
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

[Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12, 16-2(e)]

NATHANIEL COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff TRAVIS JONES, by and through his attorney of record, Kenneth Frucht of Geonetta & Frucht LLP, Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and JAMES BOSWELL, by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel's Office (the "Contra Costa Defendants"), and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO AND SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL, by and through their attorney of record, Deputy City Attorney James F. Hannawalt of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office (the "San Francisco Defendants"), hereby stipulate that the initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") currently scheduled to take place on July 30, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., be continued to September 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

Good cause exists to continue the date of the initial CMC, including preparing the Joint CMC Statement and Proposed Order per Civil Local Rule 16-9, and other associated deadlines, because the Contra Costa Defendants and the San Francisco Defendants have all filed motions to dismiss, and these motions are set to be heard on August 27, 2014. The resolution of the motions to dismiss may narrow the issues in this case, which would effect the preparation of the Joint CMC Statement and Proposed Order, and the continuance would allow the parties sufficient time before the CMC to submit to the Court a Joint CMC Statement. The parties have previously stipulated to a continuance of the initial case management conference pending Plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint. No prejudice will result to any party as a result of a continuance of the CMC.

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the stipulation filed by the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the initial Case Management Conference be continued to September 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. with the associated deadlines continued accordingly. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer