Filed: May 15, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8330 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus 408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant, 451 HOPE COURT, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including al buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant, ROBERT RICHARDSON, Claimant-Appellant, CARSWELL DENSON, et al.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 95-8330 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus 408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant, 451 HOPE COURT, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including al buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant, ROBERT RICHARDSON, Claimant-Appellant, CARSWELL DENSON, et al.,..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8330
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County,
Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances
thereon, described in Exhibit A attached,
Defendant-Appellant,
451 HOPE COURT, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County,
Georgia, Including al buildings and appurtenances
thereon, described in Exhibit B attached,
Defendant,
ROBERT RICHARDSON,
Claimant-Appellant,
CARSWELL DENSON, et al.,
Claimants.
--------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia
--------------------------
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion:
112 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir. 1997))
(January 23, 1998)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX,
BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit
Judges.*
B Y T H E C O U R T:
A member of this court in active service having requested
a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting
en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active
service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by
this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby
VACATED.
_____________________
*Senior U. S. Circuit Judge Peter T. Fay has elected to not
participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to
28 U.S.C. ยง 46(c).
2