Osborne v. The Irvine Company LLC, 8:18-cv-00772-JVS (KESx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180803688
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER REMANDING CASE BACK TO ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . The Parties to the above-referenced action filed a Stipulation to Remand the case back to Orange County Superior Court. The Court, having reviewed that Stipulation and for good cause appearing, orders as follow: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is granted; 2. Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action is dismissed with prejudice; 3. Central District of California case number 8:18-cv-00772-JVS (KESx), Osborne,
Summary: ORDER REMANDING CASE BACK TO ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . The Parties to the above-referenced action filed a Stipulation to Remand the case back to Orange County Superior Court. The Court, having reviewed that Stipulation and for good cause appearing, orders as follow: 1. The Parties' Stipulation is granted; 2. Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action is dismissed with prejudice; 3. Central District of California case number 8:18-cv-00772-JVS (KESx), Osborne, e..
More
ORDER REMANDING CASE BACK TO ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
The Parties to the above-referenced action filed a Stipulation to Remand the case back to Orange County Superior Court. The Court, having reviewed that Stipulation and for good cause appearing, orders as follow:
1. The Parties' Stipulation is granted;
2. Plaintiffs' Third Cause of Action is dismissed with prejudice;
3. Central District of California case number 8:18-cv-00772-JVS (KESx), Osborne, et al v. The Irvine Company, LLC, et al., is hereby remanded back to Orange County Superior Court; and
4. Each Party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of this case, without prejudice to any party's right, if any, to recover all such attorneys' fees or costs as a prevailing party after entry of judgment in the remanded action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
