Wolf v. University Professional and Technical Employees, C 19-02881 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190823a70
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Isaac Wolf initiated this action against various defendants seeking declaratory relief and damages for a purported deprivation of his First Amendment rights. The initial case management conference was scheduled for this morning at 11:00 A.M. The case was called. Defendants' counsel appeared, but plaintiff's counsel were not there. The case was put to the end of the calendar to give counsel the opportunity to appear. At the end o
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff Isaac Wolf initiated this action against various defendants seeking declaratory relief and damages for a purported deprivation of his First Amendment rights. The initial case management conference was scheduled for this morning at 11:00 A.M. The case was called. Defendants' counsel appeared, but plaintiff's counsel were not there. The case was put to the end of the calendar to give counsel the opportunity to appear. At the end of..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Plaintiff Isaac Wolf initiated this action against various defendants seeking declaratory relief and damages for a purported deprivation of his First Amendment rights. The initial case management conference was scheduled for this morning at 11:00 A.M. The case was called. Defendants' counsel appeared, but plaintiff's counsel were not there. The case was put to the end of the calendar to give counsel the opportunity to appear. At the end of the calendar, the case was re-called but counsel were still not there.
Accordingly, by SEPTEMBER 19, 2019, counsel for plaintiff — Mark Bucher, Brian Kelsey, and Reilly Stephens — must SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and why counsel should not be referred to the Court's Standing Committee on Professional Conduct for their absence. In addition, counsel appearing Pro Hac Vice must also SHOW CAUSE as to why their Pro Hac Vice status should not be revoked. All responses by counsel to this order to show cause must be made under oath. A hearing on this order to SHOW CAUSE is hereby set for SEPTEMBER 26 AT 8:00 A.M.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
