DEX SYSTEMS INC. v. DEUTSCHE POST AG, 2:15-cv-03841-JAK-RAO. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160726558
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . ORDER Upon consideration of Defendants Deutsche Post International B.V. and DHL Supply Chain (Netherlands) B.V.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 20), and Defendant Deutsche Post AG's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 32) (jointly, the "Motions to Dismiss"), and for other good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: a) the Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED; b) all of Plaintiff DEX Systems
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . ORDER Upon consideration of Defendants Deutsche Post International B.V. and DHL Supply Chain (Netherlands) B.V.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 20), and Defendant Deutsche Post AG's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 32) (jointly, the "Motions to Dismiss"), and for other good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: a) the Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED; b) all of Plaintiff DEX Systems I..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendants Deutsche Post International B.V. and DHL Supply Chain (Netherlands) B.V.'s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 20), and Defendant Deutsche Post AG's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Dkt. 32) (jointly, the "Motions to Dismiss"), and for other good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
a) the Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED;
b) all of Plaintiff DEX Systems Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") claims against Defendants Deutsche Post International B.V., DHL Supply Chain (Netherlands) B.V., and Deutsche Post AG (jointly, "Defendants") are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,;
c) each party is to bear its own respective costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
