Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corporation, 3:13-cv-01271-RS. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170829783 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CLASS NOTICE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, it is stipulated between and among Plaintiff Kathleen Sonner ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Premier Nutrition Corp. ("Defendant") (together, "the Parties"), by their respective counsel, as follows: WHEREAS, on July 20, 2017, Plaintiff moved for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, amending her Consumers Legal Remed
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL CLASS NOTICE

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, it is stipulated between and among Plaintiff Kathleen Sonner ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Premier Nutrition Corp. ("Defendant") (together, "the Parties"), by their respective counsel, as follows:

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2017, Plaintiff moved for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, amending her Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA") claim. ECF No. 174;

WHEREAS, On August 24, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave (ECF No. 200) and ordered the Parties meet and confer on a briefing schedule concerning Defendant's anticipated motion regarding supplemental Class notice and motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, on August 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed her SAC. ECF No. 201;

WHEREAS, on August 25, 2017, the Parties met and conferred and agreed to the following briefing schedule for Defendant's motion regarding supplemental Class notice: Defendant's opening brief is due on or before September 8, 2017, Plaintiff's opposition brief is due on or before September 22, 2017, and Defendant's reply brief is due on or before September 29, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Parties also agree that within two (2) days of the Court's ruling on Defendant's motion regarding supplemental Class notice, the Parties will meet and confer concerning a briefing schedule on Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss the SAC;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel and subject to the Court's approval, that:

1) Defendant's opening brief regarding supplemental Class notice is due on or before September 8, 2017; 2) Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's brief regarding supplemental Class notice is due on or before September 22, 2017; 3) Defendant's reply brief regarding supplemental Class notice is due on or before September 29, 2017; and

4) Within two (2) days of the Court's ruling on Defendant's motion regarding supplemental Class notice, the Parties are to meet and confer on a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss the SAC.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the above Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing Schedule on Motion for Supplemental Class Notice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court finds that good cause exists for the entry of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer