Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Taoglas Group Holdings Limited v. 2J Antennas USA, Corporation, 18CV1277 LAB (JMA). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180919a57 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY JAN M. ADLER , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed the Joint Discovery Plan and Rule 26(f) Report filed on September 13, 2018. (ECF No. 19.) In view of Defendants' pending motion to dismiss ( see ECF No. 8) as well as the possibility that Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint to add patent infringement claims ( see Joint Discovery Plan at 3), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery is stayed. Once an order has been issued on the motion to dismiss and the
More

ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

The Court has reviewed the Joint Discovery Plan and Rule 26(f) Report filed on September 13, 2018. (ECF No. 19.) In view of Defendants' pending motion to dismiss (see ECF No. 8) as well as the possibility that Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint to add patent infringement claims (see Joint Discovery Plan at 3), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery is stayed. Once an order has been issued on the motion to dismiss and the pleadings are settled, the Court will convene an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. The Court will evaluate whether discovery should be opened at that time. As to Plaintiffs' concern regarding the preservation of evidence, IT IS ORDERED that all information relevant or potentially relevant to the claims and defenses in this litigation, including electronically-stored information, shall be preserved. See Leon v. IDX Sys. Corp., 464 F.3d 951, 959 (9th Cir. 2006).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer