Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Primus Group, Inc. v. Institute for Environmental Health, Inc., 3:18-cv-00005-WHO. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190314926 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND AMENDMENT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 2-2, the parties have been operating under the Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order ("Interim Protective Order"). The Parties seek to continue operating under the Interim Protective Order, with the following change: Paragraph 7.4(a)(1) of the Interim Protective Order is amended to add the following sentence: "Notwithstanding th
More

STIPULATION AND AMENDMENT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 2-2 INTERIM MODEL PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 2-2, the parties have been operating under the Patent Local Rule 2-2 Interim Model Protective Order ("Interim Protective Order"). The Parties seek to continue operating under the Interim Protective Order, with the following change:

Paragraph 7.4(a)(1) of the Interim Protective Order is amended to add the following sentence: "Notwithstanding the above, Designated House Counsel shall not access any information or item that has been designated `HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY' and that the Producing Party has further designated as `OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY' by affixing the legend `OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY' to the information or item, or by identifying testimony as `OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.'"

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION OF FILER

The undersigned hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the attached document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories.

Dated: February 21, 2019. /s/Benjamin J. Byer Benjamin J. Byer
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer