Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTIN v. SYSCO CORPORATION, 1:16-cv-00990-DAD-SAB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170920880 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 18) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On September 15, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 18.) Upon review of the parties' stipulated protective order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' stipulated protective order is entered. However, the parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be filed under seal wi
More

ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

(ECF No. 18)

On September 15, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 18.) Upon review of the parties' stipulated protective order, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' stipulated protective order is entered. However, the parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents which are to be filed under seal will require a written request which complies with Local Rule 141. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a nondispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer