McCarrick v. Espinoza, 2: 17-cv-2652 TLN KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190826739
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner's second unopposed motion for a sixty days extension of time to file a reply to the answer. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 35) is granted; 2. Petitioner's reply to the answer is due on or before Octobe
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner's second unopposed motion for a sixty days extension of time to file a reply to the answer. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 35) is granted; 2. Petitioner's reply to the answer is due on or before October..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner's second unopposed motion for a sixty days extension of time to file a reply to the answer.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 35) is granted;
2. Petitioner's reply to the answer is due on or before October 22, 2019.
Source: Leagle
