U.S. v. HANDL, CR 15-0126 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160624869
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has received defendant Vladimir Handl's motion to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of his appeal together with a message that time is of the essence because of an impending fee deadline. Counsel should not have stampeded the Court in this manner. The Court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the express understanding that in no way does this invite a renewed request that r
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has received defendant Vladimir Handl's motion to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of his appeal together with a message that time is of the essence because of an impending fee deadline. Counsel should not have stampeded the Court in this manner. The Court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the express understanding that in no way does this invite a renewed request that re..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has received defendant Vladimir Handl's motion to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of his appeal together with a message that time is of the essence because of an impending fee deadline. Counsel should not have stampeded the Court in this manner. The Court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the express understanding that in no way does this invite a renewed request that retained counsel be compensated under the Criminal Justice Act for lawyer time, all of which should have been well within the scope of the retainer for counsel's services.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
