Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mckay v. Doordash, Inc., 19-cv-04289-MMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191030f42 Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; STAYING ACTION Re: Dkt. No. 26 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , Senior District Judge . Before the Court is defendant DoorDash, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration, filed August 12, 2019. The motion has been fully briefed. The matter came on regularly for hearing on October 25, 2019. Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP appeared on behalf of defendant. Ashley Keller and Sean Duddy of Keller Lenkner LLC appeared on behalf of plaintiff. T
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; STAYING ACTION

Re: Dkt. No. 26

Before the Court is defendant DoorDash, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration, filed August 12, 2019. The motion has been fully briefed. The matter came on regularly for hearing on October 25, 2019. Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP appeared on behalf of defendant. Ashley Keller and Sean Duddy of Keller Lenkner LLC appeared on behalf of plaintiff. The Court having considered the parties' respective submissions and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the Motion to Compel Arbitration is, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, hereby GRANTED, and the above-titled action is STAYED pending arbitration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer