Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Navarro, 2:19-MJ-00108-CKD. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190819473 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By prior order, this matter was set for Preliminary Hearing on August 8, 2019. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Preliminary Hearing until August 15, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. 3. The defendant made his initial appear
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE

STIPULATION

The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By prior order, this matter was set for Preliminary Hearing on August 8, 2019. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Preliminary Hearing until August 15, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. 3. The defendant made his initial appearance on July 25, 2019. 4. The defendant is presently in custody pending trial in this matter. 5. The defendant understands that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), "any information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested." Time may be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act if the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The parties jointly move to exclude time within which any indictment or information shall be filed from the date of this order, through and including August 15, 2019, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), because failure to do so would "deny counsel for the defendant . . . the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence." 6. Good cause exists under Rule 5.1(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

/s/Adrian T. Kinsella ADRIAN T. KINSELLA Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer