Rodriguez v. TTM Technologies, Inc., 2:16-cv-09055-AG-DFM. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190219937
Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . The Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Plaintiff, Joe H. Rodriguez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, TTM Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), was filed with the Court on February 14, 2019. Having read and considered the Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the individual claims in the case are all dismissed with prejudice and that all pu
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . The Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Plaintiff, Joe H. Rodriguez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, TTM Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), was filed with the Court on February 14, 2019. Having read and considered the Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the individual claims in the case are all dismissed with prejudice and that all pur..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
The Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Plaintiff, Joe H. Rodriguez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, TTM Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), was filed with the Court on February 14, 2019.
Having read and considered the Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the individual claims in the case are all dismissed with prejudice and that all purported claims on behalf of any class or on behalf of similarly aggrieved employees are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
