Samra v. Consumer Solutions Group, LLC, 1:19-cv-01340-NONE-EPG. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200309658
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 16) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff, Sonia K. Samra, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d
Summary: ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 16) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff, Sonia K. Samra, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d ..
More
ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 16)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On March 4, 2020, Plaintiff, Sonia K. Samra, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of entire action with prejudice. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants have not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
