EGGEBRECHT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:13-cv-1692-KJN. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140924d51
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether or not plaintiff consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) in accordance with the court's August 30, 2013 order. (ECF No. 5-1.) Accordingly, within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a statement indicating whether plaintiff consents or declines to consent to such jurisdiction. Importantly, plaintiff is under no obli
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether or not plaintiff consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) in accordance with the court's August 30, 2013 order. (ECF No. 5-1.) Accordingly, within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a statement indicating whether plaintiff consents or declines to consent to such jurisdiction. Importantly, plaintiff is under no oblig..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether or not plaintiff consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) in accordance with the court's August 30, 2013 order. (ECF No. 5-1.) Accordingly, within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall file a statement indicating whether plaintiff consents or declines to consent to such jurisdiction. Importantly, plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, and the consent/decline designation merely assists the court in determining how the case will be administratively processed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
