TAKIGUCHI v. MRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., 2:13-cv-01183-HDM-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170126d45
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On January 10, 2017, the court entered an order to show cause why several documents filed in connection with the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment should not be unsealed and the motions to seal those documents denied (ECF No. 592). No party has filed any response to the court's order, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the court's order granting the plaintiffs' motion to seal the motion for summary judgment
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On January 10, 2017, the court entered an order to show cause why several documents filed in connection with the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment should not be unsealed and the motions to seal those documents denied (ECF No. 592). No party has filed any response to the court's order, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the court's order granting the plaintiffs' motion to seal the motion for summary judgment ..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
On January 10, 2017, the court entered an order to show cause why several documents filed in connection with the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment should not be unsealed and the motions to seal those documents denied (ECF No. 592). No party has filed any response to the court's order, and the time for doing so has expired.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the court's order granting the plaintiffs' motion to seal the motion for summary judgment against Junzo Suzuki (ECF No. 531) is hereby VACATED, and the plaintiffs' motion to seal (ECF No. 528) is DENIED. The motion for summary judgment against Junzo Suzuki (ECF No. 529) shall therefore be UNSEALED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Suzukis' motion to seal their responses to the plaintiff's statement of facts (ECF No. 562) is DENIED. The Suzukis' responses to the plaintiffs' statement of facts (ECF Nos. 564 & 567) shall therefore be UNSEALED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to seal their reply to Junzo Suzuki's responses to the plaintiffs' statement of facts (ECF No. 578) is DENIED. The plaintiffs' reply to Junzo Suzuki's response to the plaintiffs' statement of facts (ECF No. 579) shall therefore be UNSEALED.
Source: Leagle
