Filed: Aug. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Icon-IP Pty Ltd. ("Icon") and Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. ("Specialized"), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order extending certain pretrial deadlines by thirty (30) days as set forth below. In support of this request, the parties state a
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Icon-IP Pty Ltd. ("Icon") and Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. ("Specialized"), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order extending certain pretrial deadlines by thirty (30) days as set forth below. In support of this request, the parties state as..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DEADLINES PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Icon-IP Pty Ltd. ("Icon") and Defendant Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. ("Specialized"), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order extending certain pretrial deadlines by thirty (30) days as set forth below. In support of this request, the parties state as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, the Court issued an Order setting the pretrial deadlines (Dkt. No. 26);
WHEREAS, the parties are actively pursuing fact discovery and are still working to resolve issues related to discovery requests and the scheduling of depositions;
WHEREAS, the parties believe the proposed extension of the deadlines will allow the parties to complete discovery;
WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to extend the deadline for the parties to hold an ADR session from January 30, 2013 to March 27, 2013 and again stipulated to extend the deadline for the parties to hold an ADR session from March 27, 2013 to April 30; 2013;
WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to extend pretrial deadlines (Dkt. No. 75);
WHEREAS, this requested extension will not affect any deadlines for any matter required to be filed or lodged with the Court, including deadlines for the parties to file dispositive motions.
WHEREAS, the parties do not believe the extension sought hereby will prejudice either party or result in undue delay;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulated and request that the Court enter an Order continuing certain deadlines as follows:
Event Current Dates Proposed Dates
Close of Fact Discovery September 19, 2014 October 24, 2014
Designation of Expert
Witnesses and Exchange of October 17, 2014 November 21, 2014
Initial Expert Reports for
which party bears burden
Designation of Rebuttal
Experts and Exchange of November 14, 2014 December 19, 2014
Rebuttal Expert Reports
Close of Expert Discovery December 19, 2014 January 19, 2015
Deadline to File Dispositive January 23, 2015 January 23, 2015
Motions
Pretrial Conference At Court's Convenience At Court's Convenience
Trial At Court's Convenience At Court's Convenience
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court continues the fact and expert discovery deadlines as follows:
Dates Event
October 24, 2014 Close of Fact Discovery
November 21, 2014 Designation of Expert Witnesses and Exchange of Initial Expert
Reports for which party bears burden
December 19, 2014 Designation of Rebuttal Experts and Exchange of Rebuttal
Expert Reports
January 19, 2015 Close of Expert Discovery
January 23, 2015 Deadline to File Dispositive Motions
April 21, 2015 Pretrial Conference Statement
May 1, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. Pretrial Conference
May 26, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
