In Re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1566), 2:06-CV-00267-RCJ (PAL). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171226710
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . ORDER The Court, having considered the unopposed motion by Defendants e prime, inc. and Xcel Energy Inc. (collectively, "the e prime Defendants") to extend the time to file a bill of costs and application for attorneys' fees, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Motion is GRANTED; and The deadline for the e prime Defendants to submit
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . ORDER The Court, having considered the unopposed motion by Defendants e prime, inc. and Xcel Energy Inc. (collectively, "the e prime Defendants") to extend the time to file a bill of costs and application for attorneys' fees, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Motion is GRANTED; and The deadline for the e prime Defendants to submit ..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
ORDER
The Court, having considered the unopposed motion by Defendants e prime, inc. and Xcel Energy Inc. (collectively, "the e prime Defendants") to extend the time to file a bill of costs and application for attorneys' fees, and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Motion is GRANTED; and
The deadline for the e prime Defendants to submit a bill of costs and application for attorneys' fees pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 54-1 and 54-14 is extended until 30 days after an opinion or order entered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals becomes a final determination of the appeal of this Court's decision on summary judgment against Sinclair Oil Corporation in the Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-16926.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
