U.S. v. PAREDES-MACHADO, 03-80244. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170714d76
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION VICTORIA A. ROBERTS , District Judge . On June 22, 2017, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 804], recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment For Failure to Include Overt Act Allegations and To Indict Prior to Expiration of Statue of Limitations [Doc. 784] be DENIED. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Cou
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION VICTORIA A. ROBERTS , District Judge . On June 22, 2017, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 804], recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment For Failure to Include Overt Act Allegations and To Indict Prior to Expiration of Statue of Limitations [Doc. 784] be DENIED. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Cour..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge.
On June 22, 2017, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 804], recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment For Failure to Include Overt Act Allegations and To Indict Prior to Expiration of Statue of Limitations [Doc. 784] be DENIED. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
Defendant's motion is DENIED.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
