Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GreenCYCLE PAINT, INC. v. PAINTCARE, INC., 3:15-cv-04059-MEJ (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160706a50 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, Defendants PaintCare, Inc., Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., and Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants") each filed separate motions to dismiss Plaintiff Greencycle Paint, Inc.'s (the "Plaintiff") First Amended Compl
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, Defendants PaintCare, Inc., Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc., and Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc. (collectively, the "Defendants") each filed separate motions to dismiss Plaintiff Greencycle Paint, Inc.'s (the "Plaintiff") First Amended Complaint ("Defendants' Motions to Dismiss").

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is due on July 6, 2016, Defendants' replies to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are due on July 13, 2016, and a hearing for Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is set for August 11, 2016.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel has requested from Defendants, and Defendants have agreed to reset the hearing date to September 29, 2016 and to extend Plaintiff's opposition deadline and Defendants' reply deadline to August 10, 2016 and August 24, 2016, respectively, for the following reasons:

(1) In addition to other matters, Plaintiff's counsel has an appeal to be filed with Cal/OSHA on behalf of United States Cold Storage, Inc. by July 1, 2016;

(2) Plaintiff's counsel has a settlement agreement to prepare and finalize on behalf of United States Cold Storage, Inc. in a separate matter;

(3) Plaintiff's counsel has a scheduled vacation from July 1, 2016 to July 11, 2016;

(4) Plaintiff's counsel has a motion for summary judgment to be prepared and filed the week after counsel returns from vacation for the Andrews v. Cavagnero, et al. matter in the Superior Court of California, County of Marin (Case No. CV 1500790);

(5) Plaintiff's counsel must oppose three separate motions to dismiss, and Defendant PaintCare, Inc.'s motion to dismiss contains over six hundred pages for review, including detailed legislative history; and

(6) The issue as to the safe harbor provision is one of first impression.

WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated to the following time modifications in this case:

(1) To extend Defendant Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 25, 2015;

(2) To extend Defendant PaintCare, Inc.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 28, 2015;

(3) To extend Defendant Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 28, 2015;

(4) To continue the hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint to December 17, 2015 and to continue all dates set forth in the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines by at least four weeks to accommodate a December 17, 2015 hearing date; and

(5) To extend Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiff's First Amendment Complaint to June 22, 2016.

WHEREAS, the parties have not requested or stipulated to any prior extensions as to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.

WHEREAS, no trial date or other pre-trial deadlines have been scheduled, so other than the hearing date on the motions to dismiss, Plaintiff's requested modification would not affect the schedule for this case.

THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE that the hearing for Defendants' Motions to Dismiss be held on September 29, 2016 and that Plaintiff's opposition and Defendants' replies be submitted on or before August 10, 2016 and August 24, 2016, respectively.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this electronically filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is reset for September 29, 2016 and that Plaintiff's opposition and Defendants' replies be submitted on or before August 10, 2016 and August 24, 2016, respectively.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer