Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ARIAS v. CLIENT SERVICES, INC., 5:16-cv-01364-EJD. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160518a07 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 13, 2016
Latest Update: May 13, 2016
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (CIVIL L.R. 6-1) EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiff GEORGE ARIAS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CLIENT SERVICES, INC. ("Defendant"), and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff served its complaint commencing this action on April 11, 2016; WHEREAS, a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond was filed on April 25, 2016, extending the deadl
More

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (CIVIL L.R. 6-1)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiff GEORGE ARIAS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant CLIENT SERVICES, INC. ("Defendant"), and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served its complaint commencing this action on April 11, 2016;

WHEREAS, a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond was filed on April 25, 2016, extending the deadline for Defendant to respond to May 15, 2016 [Docket No. 12];

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint was May 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to May 23, 2016; WHEREAS, the parties hereby stipulate as follows:

That Defendant shall have an extension of time up to and including May 23, 2016 within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. This request does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order pursuant to Civil L.R. 6.1.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer