Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ESCOBEDO v. HANFORD CHINESE KITCHEN, LLC, 1:15-cv-00879-LJO-SKO. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150910936 Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, JOSE ESCOBEDO ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, HANFORD CHINESE KITCHEN, LLC; AUGUSTINE KENG-HOU WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006; and WAH WONG WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006 (collectively "Defendants," and together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stip
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

Plaintiff, JOSE ESCOBEDO ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants, HANFORD CHINESE KITCHEN, LLC; AUGUSTINE KENG-HOU WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006; and WAH WONG WU, Co-Trustee of The Wu Family Living Trust, U/A dated September 15, 2006 (collectively "Defendants," and together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. A Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently scheduled in this matter for September 10, 2015;

2. On September 9, 2015, Defendants provided a Certified Access Specialist ("CASp") Report to Plaintiff for the purpose of resolving Plaintiff's equitable claims. Plaintiff has not yet had the opportunity to review the report;

3. The Parties had also previously agreed to a site inspection of the subject property on September 10, 2015; however, the inspection must be rescheduled to allow Plaintiff time to review the CASp report;

4. The parties based the dates originally proposed in the Joint Scheduling Report on the date of the site inspection;

5. The Parties wish to explore settlement before incurring the fees and costs associated with both the site inspection and the Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources where an independent settlement may be reached without the need for the site inspection or the Scheduling Conference; therefore,

6. The Parties agree that the Scheduling Conference may be continued from September 10, 2015 to November 19, 2015 at 10:15 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference currently set for September 10, 2015 is hereby continued to November 19, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8 before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties are to file an updated Joint Scheduling Report at least seven days prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer