Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sienze v. Kutz, 1:17-CV-0736 AWI SAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190329a89 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT BINDERS (Docs. 113 and 121) ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . In this case, both sides have objected to the other's preparation of trial exhibit binders. See Docs. 113 and 121. The Pretrial Order required the parties to meet to pre-mark and examine each other's exhibits by February 6, 2019. Doc. 72, 20:9-13. The parties met on February 5, 2019. The parties were unable to come to a mutually agreeable way to mark their exhibits. Each side then submitt
More

ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT BINDERS

(Docs. 113 and 121)

In this case, both sides have objected to the other's preparation of trial exhibit binders. See Docs. 113 and 121. The Pretrial Order required the parties to meet to pre-mark and examine each other's exhibits by February 6, 2019. Doc. 72, 20:9-13. The parties met on February 5, 2019. The parties were unable to come to a mutually agreeable way to mark their exhibits. Each side then submitted their own exhibit binders. While Defendants were not provided a copy of Plaintiff's exhibit binder, Defendants were able to review the binder a few days before trial. Each side has had an opportunity to object to the other's exhibits before the presentation of evidence in this case. All issues with the exhibit binders have been resolved and no sanctions are necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer