STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. LEAVE TO FILE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, The Mountain Club Owners Association ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, Graybar Electric Company, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Graybar"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, and stipulate as follows for an order granting Graybar leave to file its [Proposed] Third-Party Complaint against General Cable Corporation ("General Cable").

WHEREAS, this is a products-liability, manufacturing-defect case in which Plaintiff claims Graybar distributed an allegedly defective electric cable that, according to Plaintiff, caused a fire on its property. (See Second Amend. Compl. (Doc. #: 40), at ¶¶ 8-11.)

WHEREAS, based on information recently learned through discovery, Graybar now seeks leave to implead General Cable Corporation ("General Cable"), the manufacturer of the subject cable, as a third-party defendant under the doctrine of equitable indemnity. (See Graybar's [Proposed] Third-Party Complaint against General Cable Corporation, attached hereto as Exhibit A.)

WHEREAS, FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14(a)(1) provides that a defending party may, as a third-party plaintiff, implead a nonparty "who is or may be liable to [the defending party] for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against it."

WHEREAS, "the decision whether to implead a third-party defendant is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court" (Sw. Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, 791 F.2d 769, 777 (9th Cir. 1986)) and, in exercising such discretion, courts consider four factors: "1) prejudice to the original plaintiff; 2) complication of issues at trial; 3) likelihood of trial delay; and 4) timeliness of the motion to implead." Paradise Nw. Inc. v. Randhawa, No. 2:09CV02027 MCE DAD, 2010 WL 1487874, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2010).

WHEREAS, impleader of General Cable as a third-party defendant is proper under FED. R. CIV. P. 14(a) because General Cable's liability to Graybar under the doctrine of equitable indemnity is derivative of Graybar's alleged liability to Plaintiff. See American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.3d 578, 582-84 (1978).

WHEREAS, in his November 24, 2014 Stipulation & Order, Magistrate Judge Newman, based on the parties' following stipulation, established February 27, 2015, as the deadline for joining nonparties:

(See Doc. #: 44, at 4.)

WHEREAS, Graybar, by the instant Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, timely seeks leave to implead General Cable before the February 27, 2015 deadline.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not object to the impleader of General Cable and the parties have not yet exchanged expert reports or conducted depositions.

WHEREAS, because Graybar's proposed claims against General Cable are based on Plaintiff's allegations against Graybar (compare Pl.'s Second Amend. Compl. (Doc. #: 40) at ¶¶ 8-20, with Graybar's [Proposed] Third-Party Compl. at ¶¶ 10-20), the impleader of General Cable will not unduly complicate issues at trial or inject extraneous issues into the action.

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Graybar stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting Graybar leave to file the attached [Proposed] Third-Party Complaint against General Cable Corporation.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT, good cause having been show and on stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby grants Defendant Graybar Electric Company, Inc. leave to file its [Proposed] Third-Party Complaint against General Cable Corporation within ten (10) days from the date of this Order.