Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cosper v. Veros Credit, LLC, 2:15-cv-01752-MCE-CKD. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160707h82 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2016
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ORDER TO GRANT PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO CONTINUE VEROS CREDIT LLC'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . COMES NOW THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-REFERENCED ACTION AND RECITE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit on August 18, 2015; 2. WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, the parties stipulated to stay the action pending rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co
More

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO GRANT PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND AND TO CONTINUE VEROS CREDIT LLC'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

COMES NOW THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-REFERENCED ACTION AND RECITE AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit on August 18, 2015;

2. WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, the parties stipulated to stay the action pending rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2014) cert. granted, No. 14 857, 135 S.Ct. 2311 (May 18, 2015) and Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., 742 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 2014) cert. granted, 135 S.Ct. 1892 (Apr. 27, 2015).

3. WHEREAS, the Court stayed the action on January 20, 2016 pending the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings.

4. WHEREAS, U.S Supreme Court ruled in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-857, 2016 WL 228345 (U.S. Jan. 20, 2016) on January 20, 2016 and ruled in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, ___ S.Ct. ___, No. 13-1339, 2016 WL 2842447 (U.S. May 16, 2016) on May 16, 2016.

5. WHEREAS, Veros Credit, LLC filed a Status Report on May 23, 2016, updating the Court of the status of the Supreme Court's rulings.

6. WHEREAS, on May 27, 2016, the Court ordered Veros Credit, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by June 24, 2016.

7. WHEREAS, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings, Plaintiffs have expressed an intent to amend the First Amended Complaint to address the issues raised by Campbell-Ewald and Spokeo.

8. WHEREAS, to avoid unnecessary litigation expense, the Parties agree that Plaintiffs may have through July 8, 2016 to file a Second Amended Complaint and Veros may have through August 8, 2016 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES STIPULATE:

1. Plaintiffs may have through July 8, 2016 to file a Second Amended Complaint

2. Veros may have through August 8, 2016 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation,

1. Plaintiffs may have through July 8, 2016 to file a Second Amended Complaint; and

2. Veros may have through August 8, 2016 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer