Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd, 98-6404 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 98-6404 Visitors: 54
Filed: Mar. 09, 1999
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: BILL HARBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a division of Bill Harbert International, Inc., Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant, Appellee, v. CORTEZ BYRD CHIPS, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellant. No. 98-6404 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 5, 2000. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-98-G-117-S); J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before TJOFLAT and EDMONDSON,
More
BILL HARBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a division of Bill Harbert International, Inc., Plaintiff-
Counter-Defendant, Appellee,

                                                       v.

                 CORTEZ BYRD CHIPS, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellant.

                                                 No. 98-6404

                                          Non-Argument Calendar.

                                       United States Court of Appeals,

                                               Eleventh Circuit.

                                                May 5, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-98-G-117-S);
J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

        PER CURIAM:

        This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has reversed the

judgment of this Court and remanded the case for our reconsideration. See Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill

Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. ----, 
120 S. Ct. 1331
, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2000).

        The judgment of the district court is, pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, reversed, and

this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

        REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer