Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. JONES, 3:10-cv-00796-WHA. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110120d11 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FORECLOSURE SALE AND ORDER THEREON WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Michelle Yu, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On January 18, 2011 the Court issued its order granting the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this case and ordering a foreclosure of the government's lien on the real property at issue (742 Great Highway, Unit 3). 2. In that order the Court requires (
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FORECLOSURE SALE AND ORDER THEREON

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

Plaintiff United States of America and defendant Michelle Yu, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On January 18, 2011 the Court issued its order granting the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this case and ordering a foreclosure of the government's lien on the real property at issue (742 Great Highway, Unit 3).

2. In that order the Court requires (p. 13) that the sale take place and the government file a status report after the sale has occurred, and that such a report be filed no later than March 4, 2011, necessarily meaning, in the absence of some intervening order, that the sale must take place before that date.

3. Ms. Yu, the owner of the subject property, continues to wish to resolve this matter without the sale of her home. One of the options under consideration is in some way, whether by refinancing the subject property or otherwise, raising the funds to pay the amount the Court has now determined to be amount of government's lien. But with the present order for an immediate sale, it may be that the property would have to be sold before Ms. Yu could secure funds for payment. The urgency is complicated by the fact that Ms. Yu is currently in the Philippines on family business, not returning until January 27, 2011. Finally, counsel for Ms. Yu has been informed that once a foreclosure process has begun (such as by publishing notice of the sale) the refinancing process itself becomes more problematic.

5. In the circumstances of this case, the government has no objection to a brief extension of time that might permit resolution of this matter without the necessity to force a sale of Ms. Yu's home.

6. This stipulation is not intended to and does not waive or otherwise alter any rights that Ms. Yu might have to seek relief in some other way from the order granting summary judgment.

WHEREFORE the parties stipulate that the deadline for the government to file a status report regarding the foreclosure sale be moved from Friday, March 4, 2011 to Friday, May 6, 2011, and request that the Court enter this Stipulation as an order of the Court.

Except that the parties shall please not ask for further extensions,

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer