Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DE SAUSA v. HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., CV12-05081-TEH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140224742 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Fernando De Sousa ("De Sousa") and Jessica Shum ("Shum") and opt-in consenter Patricia Chui ("Chui") (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC USA Inc., and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (collectively, "HSBC," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), acting through their counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and [proposed] order to di
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Fernando De Sousa ("De Sousa") and Jessica Shum ("Shum") and opt-in consenter Patricia Chui ("Chui") (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC USA Inc., and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (collectively, "HSBC," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), acting through their counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and [proposed] order to dismiss the matter with prejudice for the following reasons:

1. After a full day of mediating before the Honorable William J. Cahill, HSBC and all three individual Plaintiffs have successfully resolved their disputes.

2. The parties have resolved their disputes privately and Plaintiffs wish to discontinue this lawsuit with prejudice. The dismissal will not impact the right of any individuals other than Plaintiffs.

SO STIPULATED.

[Proposed] Order

Based on the above stipulation of counsel, this matter is dismissed with prejudice. All deadlines are hereby terminated and the Clerk is instructed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer