USA v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc.,, 2:13-cv-1158 JAM EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171218704
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY MARCH 14, 2018 JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that: 1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 111), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY MARCH 14, 2018 JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that: 1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 111), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently ..
More
ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY MARCH 14, 2018
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that:
1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 111), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and
2. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by March 14, 2018 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
