Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Perez v. City of Los Angeles, CV17-06592 RGK (PJWx). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181012944 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT AND IAN CHESSUM AFTER RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56] R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Having considered the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and IAN CHESSUM ("LAPD Defendants") and the evidence presented in support thereof, the Court GRANTED the LAPD
More

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT AND IAN CHESSUM AFTER RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56]

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Having considered the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and IAN CHESSUM ("LAPD Defendants") and the evidence presented in support thereof, the Court GRANTED the LAPD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety on October 1, 2018. [Doc. 61].

It is now therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Ian Chessum are entitled to judgment in their favor and against Plaintiff Veronica Perez, that Plaintiff Veronica Perez have and recover nothing by reason of each and all of the claims set forth in her First Amended Complaint against Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Ian Chessum, and that Defendants City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Ian Chessum shall recover costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer