UNITED STATES EX REL. BAKER v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., 05-279 WJ/Act. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20120720b36
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER ALAN C. TORGERSON, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 529]. The Court declines to strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 522], but Defendants may submit their rebuttal within ten (10) days of entry of this Order. The Court does not require a response or reply to Doc. 529 and the United States will not be allowed to respond to Defendants' rebuttal. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants
Summary: ORDER ALAN C. TORGERSON, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 529]. The Court declines to strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 522], but Defendants may submit their rebuttal within ten (10) days of entry of this Order. The Court does not require a response or reply to Doc. 529 and the United States will not be allowed to respond to Defendants' rebuttal. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants'..
More
ORDER
ALAN C. TORGERSON, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 529]. The Court declines to strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 522], but Defendants may submit their rebuttal within ten (10) days of entry of this Order. The Court does not require a response or reply to Doc. 529 and the United States will not be allowed to respond to Defendants' rebuttal.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike the United States' Closing Argument [Doc. 529] is granted in part and denied in part as stated herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
