Filed: Jan. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge. SANTA CLARA VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, INC. ("Santa Clara"), and KRISTEN M. BOWES ("Bowes") (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs") and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("United States"), by and through their attorneys, hereby request that the Case Management Conference may be continued from January 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. to February 16, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. The reason for the continuance is as
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge. SANTA CLARA VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, INC. ("Santa Clara"), and KRISTEN M. BOWES ("Bowes") (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs") and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("United States"), by and through their attorneys, hereby request that the Case Management Conference may be continued from January 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. to February 16, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. The reason for the continuance is as f..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge.
SANTA CLARA VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, INC. ("Santa Clara"), and KRISTEN M. BOWES ("Bowes") (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs") and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("United States"), by and through their attorneys, hereby request that the Case Management Conference may be continued from January 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. to February 16, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.
The reason for the continuance is as follows:
1. On February 14, 2011, SCVHG filed a Motion for summary Judgment on Second Class of Stock Issue (Doc. #70), Bowes filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #71) and the United States filed a Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues Against SCVHG (Doc. #66).
2. On September 21, 2011, the Court issued Order Re Parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. #96) in which it: (1) granted United States' motion for partial summary judgment; (2) denying SCVHG's motion for summary judgment; and (3) granting in part and denying in part Bowes' motion for summary judgment.
3. On September 26, 2011, this case was reassigned to the San Francisco division to the Honorable William H. Alsup.
4. On October 7, 2011, SCVHG filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration seeking reconsideration of the Court's Order Re Parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment dated September 21, 2011 (Doc. #96).
5. On October 12, 2011, the first Case Management Conference was held before this Court. In the Civil Pretrial Minutes, the Court stated that Judge Jeremy Fogel would rule on SCVHG's Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration, the trial schedule would be set after Judge Fogel's ruling, and a further Case Management Conference was set for December 15, 2011.
6. On November 1, 2011, Judge Fogel granted SCVHG's Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration and a final briefing schedule was set.
7. The United States filed its Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration on November 21, 2011 and SCVHG filed it Reply to Defendant's Opposition on November 30, 2011. This matter is submitted and before Judge Fogel.
8. The parties believe that a Case Management Conference would be more productive after Judge Fogel rules on the Motion for Reconsideration so that the parties will know what issues remain in the case.
Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate that the Court continue the Case Management Conference from January 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. to February 16, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
