SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER v. PRICE, 1:16-CV-00759-AWI-JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170629b41
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 57) ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On June 21, 2017, Defendants Eric La Price, Alfred Watson, Kevin Elliot, and United States Forest Service and Intervenor-Defendant Sierra Forest Products ("Defendants") applied ex parte for leave to file Replies in support of their Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment ("Application"). Having considered
Summary: ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 57) ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On June 21, 2017, Defendants Eric La Price, Alfred Watson, Kevin Elliot, and United States Forest Service and Intervenor-Defendant Sierra Forest Products ("Defendants") applied ex parte for leave to file Replies in support of their Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment ("Application"). Having considered t..
More
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FEDERAL DEFENDANTS AND INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. No. 57)
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
On June 21, 2017, Defendants Eric La Price, Alfred Watson, Kevin Elliot, and United States Forest Service and Intervenor-Defendant Sierra Forest Products ("Defendants") applied ex parte for leave to file Replies in support of their Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment ("Application"). Having considered the Application, and for good cause shown, the Court will grant Defendants' Application to file Replies. Further, the Court will allow Plaintiff to file a Sur-Reply within 10 days of this order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Federal Defendants and Intervenor-Defendant's Application is granted;
2. The proposed Replies attached to the Application are deemed filed as of June 21, 2017;
3. Plaintiff may file a Sur-Reply within 10 calendar days of the date of this order; and
4. No further briefing on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment will be accepted by the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
