CASEY v. DNOW, L.P., 1:15-cv-01899 DAD JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170626667
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE Doc. 88 JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 32), i
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE Doc. 88 JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 32), it..
More
ORDER CLOSING CASE
Doc. 88
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On June 22, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 32), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
